Learn to play electric guitar

. Here a subject which has you particuli?ment int?ss?Je account to follow courses of music and to learn?ouer from the guitar, is what it would be better to learn the traditional guitar. the dur?totale to know maitriser the guitar. I will answer without r??ir that a good base of "Acoustic" guitar is essential with the whole d?t. m? until A statement that the cords nylons are most suited?on training the sound is hot, powerful and the handle is broad what facilit?raiment placement of the fingers. I will also like to know the hard one? total to know maitriser. Did Alexandre Lagoya like?anger that ten ann? by cord?it a good calculation 6 X 10ans = 60ans. S?eusement, the first r?ltats (with solf? the support has) are made feel at the end of two years for s?eux good on -)) s?eux = 1h of instrument/jour All that remains that a personal point of view.-)). Michel Paves Ave - Administrator of LGFS - All d?nd of what you want to do with your guitar. If you never have touch?ne guitar, It will take you 35 minutes well to learn the totalit?u r?rtoire from the Nirvana group, whereas 35 years are?eine sufficient to approach some. Not, I joke, to learn Nirvana, it will take you less Plaisanterie time? euro put?art, I advise you to start with the instrument which you have desire for teasing, which it is one. My opinion is in any case to start with good bases of technique. If I want to play of the Nirvana I do not need to know. - Is, it is not m? not n?ssaire to know to grant its s?eusement I think than when the music is begun, one does not know o?lle can carry out us. y has almost 20 years while wanting to learn the hard rock. one worked of ear and on the tabs. of best the?les which are, but is not always enough. Later, while passing in a r?rtoire and a style more. If I had commenc??le d?t, with good bases, I would not have lost as many time. I thus believe n?ssaire to learn what all the musics have in common, that it is on a folk or a guitar flamenco, it is?anger the solf? and all that surrounds it, and honn?ment, they is much more sympathetic to include/understand or at least better to encircle it. And one reconsiders from there?ne old discussion of the list Profs (see files of the messages), because best F? to start well is with good professors and. Do many heart?rm?nt of volont?une mountain of work, and especially, especially to take pleasure?ouer Good courage, you have nothing any more but a few tens of ann? of training. That all the fans of Nirvana excuse me. Also d?tante, the only trick that I could say to you, it is "weapon you of patience and bump", it does not have there a miraculous formula. When at time that it is necessary to learn how to recall which, forgiveness) who said?e prone that to learn?ouer from the guitar, approximately ten years had to be counted. Good courage and especially h?te not?e to launch, it is. Personally I have commenc?a scrape with courses of traditional with a good teacher who same if it?it sometimes a little "born?a known to make me play rather quickly (in a few weeks) of the simple pieces, which is always agr?le and gratifying undoubtedly the fingers a little" D??, I made. Honestly, I lime pits not of these d?ts, same if I almost compl?ment have laiss?omber the traditional one of training, although the traditional technique is enough far from that. In any case one acquires a certain "philosophy" of the training, and one can a little better?uoi expect. I could formulate, it is that one never taught me?aire from the agreements, same simple, and that I always did not see the relationship with what did of the buddies who practised the accompaniment. When I put myself at the folk then?'?ctric, some ann? later, I did not have too many concern of adaptation, and in more I?is one of rare?avoir to play "with the fingers" ("fingerstyle" thus), which the other guitarreux ones did not fail to raise that I fr?entais. Time that it is necessary to pass?pprendre before really playing is?on direction extr?ment subjective must be able to be played into 1 or 2 months, at least on a cord when one has jou?ue?pendant three months one can test oneself. And does of them what it is necessary well to include/understand, it is that one always learns: new pieces, new technical "trick" learns about quickly or then from the tricks which appear impossible, will pass without probl? some ann? later. one understands a sympathetic piece, one tries to play it of the times you tombs on one which you can play in 1/2 hour, whereas you need ann?. first of all knows that if you want to play of the?ctric guitar, it is not n?ssaire to pass by the traditional one, m? if? then there is a question "of esprit", to?avoir that I know the traditional ones who have played for fifteen years and which do not know and vice versa, but they are two worlds diff?nts m? to play of Nirvana(et I am not a fan is necessary as a technique, more primary as the traditional one certainly, but bases are needed in short selected what you want to do while remaining open to the remainder to have pratiqu?e traditional, I found the training more ungrateful, and difficult bus before playing asturias it?a limit in picking you can play of the standards in a few months all?d?nd especially of time qu you will pass on your guitar, then it does not matter the style for ma?iser the guitar, it is necessary to count four or five lives of. Whatever the style that you intend to choose, I advise you never to have done it, to choose, above all, a professor comp?nt. That will?tera you many t?nnements and will save you.